Digital Diet / Digital Fast

129 Comments

Many of us have experiences about more or less voluntary or involuntary ‘media diet’ or ‘media fast’ in special circumstances: Courses, vacations… There were numerous great stories in response to Amelia’s blog entry on Digital Time.

Recently, the NYT posed the Unplugged Challenge:  It asked some readers, ‘ordinary people’, to experiment on being offline. Here are their stories. This seems to be almost a trend: There are numerous bloggers (!), such as this one, who advocate a media diet and let the world know about their efforts. Also, several academic research projects are currently addressing the question, like this and this one (thank you, David).

But what if we tried a media fast on an ordinary day — no cell phones, computers, no games, no movies (or even those old-fashioned TV, radio, and news papers)? Or even a diet for half-a-day? How about that for each of us as an experiment in autoethnography?

Fordham students: blog about your experiences by Fri 10/1. Describe and analyse — think of reasons and possible consequences regarding your experiences in terms of communication. Read some comments on Amelis’s Digital Time post, for your inspiration!

Advertisements

Digital Media Industries in Our Everyday Lives

16 Comments

Blogging and  learning, part 2. Can’t leave this forum alone (see the previous entry of the same theme). I’m currently teaching a course on media industries in which the students will write several so called position papers, i.e., argue for or against a certain statement, stand, or slogan, with logic and some evidence.

Since I firmly believe in the importance of us as scholars being able to operate in different forums I decided to offer the students an opportunity/option to blog about their experiences, thoughts and informed opinions — to act as public intellectuals — if they wish to use this forum to do so. (If they so choose, they can also write a short ‘conventional’ position paper instead.)

The students of the Intro to Media Industries @Fordham have a tough question to answer by 9/17:

To rephrase the Internet guru Jonathan Zittrain‘s argument (as presented in his 2008 book The Future of the Internet, here’s a short video illustrating his thinking):

It could be said that many commercially, globally highly successful technological innovations (IPods, Xboxes, MSOffice…) may make our lives easy in that they become almost global standards, or at least preferred tools and gadgets among many of our peers. But the same time, they do shape — and thus limit — the way we use the Internet and communicate.

Do you think it is so– or not? Why? Give examples of your own media use!

Digital Time / Fast Time

104 Comments

I had an interesting conversation with my mother yesterday. We were talking about how much time it can take to answer one’s emails, as well as how difficult it can be to find time to sit down and concentrate on writing or creating or thinking or just being. She commented, “it seems like we have a new relationship with time.”

I asked her what she meant by that. She explained, “I often hear people saying, ‘things seem to be going faster and faster’.” We then remembered a conversation we had a few years back with my grandmother. My mother had asked her, “in the 1950s, when you were a young woman, do you remember things being this busy, time moving so fast?” My grandmother answered, “no! you all seem to be much busier today than people where then.”

I have been thinking of this conversation in relation to an article I read a few days ago about a former businessman who decided to live for one year without money. Someone he met through Freecycle.org donated a caravan for him to live in. He set up the caravan on the property of an organic farm in exchange for working there three days per week. Throughout the year he foraged for food, built his own stove, bartered, rode his bicycle, and lived simply. Interestingly, the article described what happened to time as he led his life without money:

“Everything in Mark’s life takes a lot longer as part of his new moneyless routine. Washing his clothes takes a couple of hours of scrubbing with hand-made soap. Even a cup of tea takes half an hour to make! But Mark says, “It’s all worth it in the end because the feeling of liberation and connection with nature it has afforded me more than compensates for the minor inconveniences.”

“Taking time out from the hectic money-driven world that we live in has taught Mark a lot. Although his experience of living without money has occasionally been difficult, it has also been the happiest time of his life.”

Mark Boyle, The Moneless Man: A Year Of Freeconomic Living. http://tinyurl.com/22k28b9

Reading this it strikes me that there is perhaps a relationship between time and one’s impact on the environment. The more simply one lives: the more time it takes: the less impact one has on the planet. Or maybe: the more complexly one lives: the faster things move: the more impact one has on the planet? The equation is simplistic, but perhaps worth considering…

For example, Mark might take 30 minutes to pick fresh nettles growing nearby his caravan, gather wood, build a fire, boil spring water, and make a cup of tea. A time-consuming, yet meditative activity. Meanwhile the typical American, waking up at 7am for a commute to work, might take 2 minutes to make a cup of instant coffee by boiling water drawn from the vast infrastructure of a city water system, plopping in a few spoonfuls of powered coffee picked and processed far away, and rushing out the door with cup-in-hand. In the 28 extra minutes the coffee drinker has saved he perhaps checks his email, writes two quick messages, eats a peanut butter sandwich, skims the newspaper headlines on three websites, and packs his laptop up to take to work. I can guess that the convenient cup of instant coffee has a much bigger environmental footprint than the cup of nettle tea – let alone the impact of all the other activities that the coffee drinker manages to squeeze into his day!

All this makes me wonder … what is the nature of digital time? That is, the speed of business transactions, communication, trading, purchasing, life, the stock market, travel, bank loans, etc. that is enabled by computers, the internet, mobile devices. Is digital time always faster? What is the relationship between digital time and the environment? Or, the relationship between digital time and other kinds of time – family time, day/night time, season time, sleep-time, creative time? What happens if/when we choose not to participate in digital time?

I mentioned that I was interested in investigating the experience of “digital time” to a colleague at lunch.  She immediately said, “oh, you mean like how when you spend an evening without your computer time seems to stretch out forever, and when you have your computer it just goes by so much more quickly?” Yes …